Because the mid-Sixties, the CMB has been recognized with the Huge Bang’s leftover glow. Might any various explanations nonetheless work?
Irrespective of how robust the proof is in favor a scientific principle, there’ll at all times be contrarians that come alongside and encourage the exploration of alternate options. This isn’t essentially out of stubbornness, however is usually completed in an try to topic even our most well-supported theories to rigorous scrutiny and ever-stronger testing. Nonetheless, oftentimes these contrarian positions must ignore a considerable quantity of proof to ensure that their most popular alternate options to outlive. As cosmologist Mike Turner as soon as famously put it, “you possibly can solely invoke the tooth fairy as soon as,” which means that you simply may be capable of justify a state of affairs with one main modification, however as soon as you need to begin doing a number of cartwheels to get round a mountain of proof, your various concept is a misplaced trigger.
Undeterred by that notion, many — principally crackpots however together with just a few critical scientists — have challenged the “cosmic” interpretation of the noticed cosmic microwave background (CMB), going all the best way again to Fred Hoyle some 60 years in the past. Are we 100% assured that the CMB actually qualifies as “smoking gun” proof for the recent Huge Bang…
